How Coins Are Made


If you are searching for errors and varieties, you need to know the process used at the U.S. Mint. Otherwise, you will think damaged coins are valuable errors.

Before we describe the minting process, we need to make an analogy. Most people know how newspapers are printed. So let’s start there.

Printing Process

Newsroom editors design the layout for each page, including photos and illustrations. Using a laser, a press employee creates an aluminum plate, attached to a drum. Plates are coated with ink, and the drum spins, transferring ink to rubber blanket. Paper is fed through those blankets to print each page.


If the ink blurs a page, or if there is insufficient ink, the press run has to be stopped because that error will appear in every newspaper.


This newspaper was damaged by rain and fire. It did not leave the press room like this.


Likewise, this coin was damaged by fire. It didn’t leave the U.S. Mint like that.


A damaged coin is not a mint error or variety.

The Minting Process

A coin’s design is created by artists. The Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee and the Commission of Fine Arts review designs and select one for manufacturing.


The chosen design is transferred to a master die made from hardened steel to preserve the coin for future reference. That master die creates working dies used to strike the coins. 


The Mint purchases metal coils for each denomination. Those are straightened so that the blanking press can make planchets.


Blanks are heated to soften and prepare them for striking. That process includes a striking hammer that pounds the blank between obverse and reverse of a working die.


Blanks are squeezed by a machine called an upsetting mill to form a rim. 


A quality control operator inspects the first run of a particular coin to ensure that no mistakes are made.


Mintmarks used to be hand-punched directly into the working die. Engravers manually struck a steel punch bearing the mintmark onto the die.

This resulted in varied positions and sometimes faint or shadowed impressions, known as repunched mint marks (RPMs), because a technician might not have struck the punch perfectly straight or the impression was too weak, requiring a second attempt.

Here is a nifty list so that you know how to describe the RPMs:


After 1989, the mintmark was added to the master hub, leading to consistent, identical mintmarks on all working dies from that point forward.

What This Means

Think again about a newspaper page with an error like blurred or smeared ink. Maybe one photograph with the wrong caption or misspelled name. Those errors will appear on each page unless the press operator stops the run and fixes the flaw.

This is the same process when minting coins. In other words, a particular flaw will exist on all coins made by the damaged working die.

So if you think your coin has a “unique” flaw, it is likely not an error or variety. The U.S. Mint does not make coins one planchet at a time. In fact, each die may make up to a million coins before being exchanged for a new working die.

Changing working dies means extra work. Sometimes Mint employees will polish a die so that it can continue striking. This may result in die deterioration responsible for filled mint marks, struck through grease, and “L” in “Liberty, for instance, close to the rim of a cent.

Sometimes quality control falters. For instance, some 40,000 double die 1955 cents were mistakenly released to the public. There was a reason, too. In 1955, the Philadelphia Mint was working overtime to meet the demand for new cents, primarily because of a one-cent tax on cigarettes. In the round-the-clock mayhem, the hub doubling was missed and those errors were mixed with other non-error cents.


If you understand the minting process, you won’t be led astray by clickbait social media coin videos and hyped values of error coins and varieties.

Proxiblog, operated by Michael Bugeja, a former writer for Coin World and past member of the U.S. Mint’s Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee, has seen production at the Philadelphia Mint and branch mints. He has assembled two valuable directories: one is an illustrated coin glossary that contains terms used in the minting process, and one that lists all the errors and varieties of popular denominations recognized by the U.S. Mint as well as top holdering companies.

If you like posts like this, please subscribe so you can be informed whenever there is a new article or column.

Proxiblog also has thousands of followers on Facebook Coin Groups, YouTube and social media. To get the latest discussion and commentaries, click here.

You can find more information about errors and varieties as well as buying and bidding on coins in Coin News Updated: The Essential Guide to Online Bidding. Please consider purchasing the work for yourself or a friend, as it underwrites this hobbyist website. Thank you.

Most Comprehensive Illustrated Numismatic Glossary on the Web

Click Here to Go to the Glossary


Proxiblog.org, a free educational coin site, features one of the most comprehensive illustrated encyclopedias of numismatic terms with nearly 300 entries. Learn to spot cuds, die breaks, split dies, machine doubling, double dies, mules, patina, lamination and so much more! This video describes the basic and most used terms, using the Lincoln Memorial Cent with history of each term in the left-corner quote box. Subscribe and twice weekly reports about coin identification, holdering, bidding, buying, selling and detecting counterfeits. Operated by Michael Bugeja, one of the top numismatists in the country, who wrote for Coin World, Coin Update News, Greysheet and was a past member of the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee of the U.S. Mint.

If you like posts like this, subscribe so you can be informed whenever there is a new article or column.

Proxiblog also has thousands of followers on Facebook Coin Groups, YouTube and social media. To get the latest discussion and commentary, be sure to friend us by clicking here.

You can find more information about types, varieties, errors, grading, bidding and buying in Coin News Updated: The Essential Guide to Online Bidding. Please consider buying or gifting the work for a friend, as it underwrites this hobbyist blog. Thank you.

The quarter that looks like an error


The 2023 quarter honors the life and work of Mexican-American suffragette, journalist and teacher Jovita Idár. In my opinion, this is one of the worst designs ever struck on a U.S. coin, not because of the depiction of her, but because the denomination, motto and legend are integrated into clothing with other words describing her amazing life, which you can read about here.

In this article I will defend my opinion about the worst design and risk offending friends in the process, because I was a past member of the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee (2008-14) and know many of the members who voted for this design. I also am the author of Basic Coin Design, a comprehensive study of all U.S. Mint circulating coinage, identifying the placement and artistic effect of dates, denominations, legends, mottoes, symbols and other devices.

That study earned me a place on the CCAC.

Like Idár, I am a journalist and teacher. We cover her contributions in my media ethics course at Iowa State University of Science and Technology. So I will speaking in the critical voice of a reporter and professor here.

Idár would applaud that.

The reverse design is the work of metallic artist John P. McGraw. It is fine. The portrait is not the problem. The CCAC forgot a critical aspect of circulating coinage. The public has to identify it as a coin, not a medal and not an error. The last time the Mint made such a blunder was with the Susan B. Anthony dollar, which the public hated because it looked like a quarter. The Idár quarter looks like an error, and that misleads the public.

It is a shame that the Mint blundered on two suffragette coins and, as we shall learn later, yet another suffragette.

The quarter is a relatively small coin, with a diameter of 0.955 inches. You cannot jam all manner of information onto it as the Mint has done here.

Look closely. You will see all the words describing Idár’s legacy on the large photo. Nice. But now look at the design in the shape of a quarter. The words look like a laced blouse.


We lose denomination, motto, legend and other attributes of U.S. coinage. Lost in the post-modernist word salad are all the data that make a coin a coin.

Imagine if the CCAC and its sister committee, the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, chose the same reverse but with identifying lettering, as in design 8A, which includes United States of America, Quarter Dollar and E Pluribus Unum?


What’s my motive here criticizing the CCAC, CFA and U.S. Mint, all which I treasure? Why am I compelled in 2024 to write about a 2023 coin?

In 2024, I joined a dozen Facebook coin groups as a way to promote my educational coin website, Proxiblog.org. Each month hundreds of members ask us if the Idár quarter is an error so glaring as to have omitted denomination, motto and legend.

The situation has become so bad that FB group moderators immediately shut down comments as soon as someone asks if this is a big blunder of a coin.

This was just posted by the group “Coin Identification” as I was writing this article:


The last comment before shutdown calls the Idár quarter the most “popular” of all time. Perhaps “fishy” is a better word.

To complicate matters, the font of the obverse loses a descender on the “G” and seemingly reads, “In Cod We Trust” instead of “In God We Trust.

Down the rabbit hole we go once again revisiting one of the worst decisions in the history of U.S. coinage.

The Washington portrait was originally designed by Laura Gardin Fraser (1889-1966). Fraser, also a suffragette, is one of the most gifted Mint sculptors of all time. She designed some of America’s most elegant coins, including the 1921 Alabama Centennial half dollar, the 1922 Grant Memorial half dollar, and the iconic 1926 Oregon Trail Memorial half dollar.

In 1931, Fraser won the competition to design a new quarter featuring George Washington. But Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon overlooked her masterpiece and instead chose a design by John Flanagan. On artistic values alone, there is no comparison between the two designs.


Here’s her original casting:


The CCAC and CFA recommended that a version of her overlooked design grace the American Women series. Excellent choice, if you went with her font.

Here’s what we got:


The font deviates from the Fraser design, which had a distinct descender on the “G.” The font that the Mint chose lacks that:


Again, the CCAC and CFA forgot about the quarter’s diameter. So the motto reads “In Cod We Trust.”

Scammers on eBay, Etsy, TikTok, YouTube and other venues claim that the quarter actually glorifies a fish rather than a deity, celebrating the 1 million pounds of Cod captured by the US Fishing Fleet.

Here’s what came up on my screen just now on eBay:


Worse, there are videos promising instant cash if you find the Idár quarter in pocket change:


Because of the error hype and clickbait on social media, and the incessant inquiries by new collectors asking if they have struck it rich, I would like to remind the CCAC and CFA to embrace basics of coin design, including diameter of your metallic canvas.

For those curious about how the CCAC endorsed design 8 rather than design 8A, read the transcript of their discussions by clicking here.

As for me, rather than respond dozens of times per day to Facebook coin group members who think the Idár quarter is an error, all I do now is post this article, saving time before moderators shut off comments.

If you like posts like this, subscribe so you can be informed whenever there is a new article or column.

Proxiblog also has thousands of followers on Facebook Coin Groups, YouTube and other social media. To get the latest discussion and commentary, be sure to friend us by clicking here.

You can find more information about types, varieties, errors, grading, bidding and buying in Coin News Updated: The Essential Guide to Online Bidding. Please consider buying or gifting the work for a friend, as it underwrites this hobbyist blog. Thank you.